|
Some clients ask if they should try to settle their personal injury case on their own. There are many circumstances when settling the accident case on your own would be prudent. First, if your case only involves property damage, I would certainly recommend you resolve the matter on your own. You can seek an attorney’s guidance along the way, but you should be able to handle the property damage claim on your own without too much trouble. Just keep in mind that it’s never fun to resolve a property damage claim and you probably won’t be 100% satisfied. I’ve never had clients tell me they were 100% satisfied with their property damage experience. Even if your car is a total loss, and they fairly reimburse you, you still have to go through the hassle. That’s just the way things are.
You can also handle your own case if you have minor property damage and some minor injuries. If there isn’t any discernible property damage that can be easily seen, you’re probably better off without the assistance of a lawyer. When clients call my office for an evaluation, I always ask, “Do I need to squint to see the property damage on your car?” If your case isn’t worth very much money, it doesn’t make sense to involve an attorney. However, if you have significant property damage and significant injuries, it makes sense to get an attorney’s assistance. Make sure you get an honest assessment from an experienced personal injury lawyer before making this decision. During a lawsuit, each side to the lawsuit has the right to “discovery.” That means, each side can “discover” more about the opposing party’s position by obtaining documents, asking written questions, etc. There are definite formalities to the process which befuddle most members of the public. It often appears to be more “form over substance” but that’s the way the system is designed. It also takes a long time to occur. In California, most lawsuits last at least one year. Keep in mind a lawsuit is usually only filed if a case is unable to resolve prior to litigation. When you file a lawsuit, you essentially start over again.
During a lawsuit, a “deposition” (or several) may be taken as part of the “discovery” process. You’ve certainly seen them on television – a lawyer is asking questions of a witness (under oath) and there are other lawyers in the room along with a court reporter writing everything down on a cool nifty machine as fast as possible. Usually, on TV, there is high drama with most of the attorneys sparring and yelling at each other. Some add fist-pounding! Truth is most depositions are boring events with questions being asked from every conceivable angle. Sometimes clients have a hard time understanding why the questions are so detailed. Sometimes the truth is indeed in the details, but the attorneys are trying to learn more about what a witness might say in court….and not just WHAT they might say, but HOW they say it. If an attorney is taking your deposition, they are not only evaluating what you are saying but also your witness potential. They are asking themselves, “How well would this person testify before a jury? How likable are they? How believable are they? How much conviction does this person have? Do they keep changing their story? Do they appear to be honest?” Let’s face it, juries vote for people they like – just like anything else in life. In my career as an attorney, I firmly believe the deposition is the most important part of the “discovery” process. In many cases, a good deposition (or a bad one) can change the course of a case. Make sure you prepare for your deposition by discussing what to expect with your lawyer. |
Attorney Robert MansourRobert Mansour is an attorney in Santa Clarita, California who has been practicing law since 1993. After working for 13 years for the insurance companies, he now counsels victims of personal injury. Click here to learn more about Robert Mansour. Categories
All
Archives
May 2025
|
Free Consultations 661-414-7100 / Text 661-402-1125
RSS Feed
